Tell MCP Studio what your agents need to do. It proposes the tools, wires the connectors and credentials, and deploys a governed task-specific MCP server your agents can call in minutes.
Free to start · No card required
Stalled after an unanswered pricing objection · last 90 days
Priya and Marcus own 61% of the stalls. Start the coaching there.
MCP serversbuilt by MCP Studio
Connector probes · 5 tools · live
1,000+ connectors
Nexla gateway
No code
required
1,000+
managed connectors
Bidirectional
read and write
Enterprise
security built in
The case for task-specific
The industry's own numbers say agents drown in tool definitions before they ever answer. A task-specific server is the direct response: scoped to the job at hand, it exposes only the tools that job needs, in a schema of about 1,200 tokens where a vendor's native server re-sends 39,000 on every turn. Then we benchmarked it against those native servers to prove it.
The industry’s own numbers
49% → 74%
Five connected MCP servers produce 58 tools and roughly 55,000 tokens of definitions before the conversation starts; Anthropic's internal setup hit 134,000. Their Tool Search Tool lifted MCP evaluation accuracy on Opus 4 from 49% to 74% purely by narrowing what the model sees.
Anthropic · Introducing advanced tool use52 tools · ~9,400 tokens
Four internal MCP servers exposed 52 tools costing roughly 9,400 tokens of definitions. Cloudflare's enterprise reference architecture scopes what each agent sees, so the cost stays fixed as servers are added instead of growing with every one.
Cloudflare · Scaling MCP adoption93.1% vs 87.1%
A 2026 tool-retrieval study reached the same task coverage while showing the model roughly seven times fewer tools, and adaptive shortlists beat a fixed tool list on selection accuracy, 93.1% to 87.1%. Fewer, sharper tools make agents more accurate, not less capable.
arXiv · How many tools should an agent see?“It eats too much context window.”
Garry Tan, CEO of Y Combinator, on why he ripped MCP out of his own workflow: “MCP sucks honestly. It eats too much context window.” The market's loudest complaint about MCP is tool bloat, said out loud by the person who funds the market.
Garry Tan · on X01 · CRM
vs. HubSpot CRM MCP
90-day won/lost revenue analysis on a live portal
02 · Ads
vs. Google Ads MCP
10 reporting tasks × 2 frontier models, 40 task-cells
03 · Calls
vs. Avoma MCP
Meeting and call analysis on a live account
04 · Warehouse
vs. Google BigQuery MCP
20 operational tasks, Claude API harness
Run by Nexla on our own harness, which is exactly why every method, task list, and raw trace is published. Read them, question them, re-run them.
One workspace, end to end
MCP Studio absorbs the connector maintenance, credential handling, and schema drift that make agent tooling a chore.
How it works
MCP Studio turns a task description into a working MCP server while keeping every tool visible and editable.
Say what the agent should be able to do, in plain English. MCP Studio reads your context and proposes a tool set with names, parameters, and connector bindings. No SDK, YAML, or glue code.
Edit the proposed tools, bind credentials, and hit Build. MCP Studio creates the sources and toolset, then registers the server in your org's catalog.
The server is live and callable on the next turn, with access governed by Nexla for every agent and person you allow.
Pricing
Credits cover the work MCP Studio performs; connectors and infrastructure aren't billed separately. You don't need a card to start.
For trying Express and shipping your first data flows.
100 credits / month
Start building freeFor teams moving production data every day.
1,000 credits / month · billed annually
Checkout unavailableFor organizations with custom scale and governance needs.
Credits and limits tailored to your team
Talk to usFAQ
Still evaluating a specific task? Start a free chat and describe it. The fastest answer is often a working server.
MCP Studio is Nexla’s builder for task-specific MCP servers. Describe what your agents need to do and it proposes the tools, builds the server, and operates the connectors, credentials, and governed access behind it.
No. MCP Studio works from plain-English intent, and you review every proposed tool before it's built. Advanced users can still inspect and refine what it creates.
MCP Studio builds on Nexla’s catalog of 1,000+ managed, bidirectional connectors across SaaS apps, databases, warehouses, files, APIs, and streaming systems.
Yes. Servers inherit governed schemas, lineage, access controls, auditing, retries, and monitoring from Nexla, and every publish is a tested, immutable revision you can roll back.
Yes. Re-open the project and re-prompt to add a tool, tighten a parameter, or rebind a credential. Changes remain reviewable, and the platform preserves revision history and rollback.
Build it now, then re-prompt it as the task changes, with revisions and rollback the whole way.
Start building free
